X-Sympa-To: ids.analysis.forum
Received: from hector.cls.fr (osis.cls.fr [62.161.32.21])
	by hermes.cls.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA29499
	for <ids.analysis.forum@hermes.cls.fr>; Fri, 17 Nov 2006 17:48:04 GMT
Received: by hector.cls.fr (Postfix)
	id DDACE925CB; Fri, 17 Nov 2006 17:48:03 +0000 (GMT)
Delivered-To: ids.analysis.forum@cls.fr
Received: from cluster-e.mailcontrol.com (orange-103.cls.fr [62.161.32.14])
	by hector.cls.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 270C4151A1C
	for <ids.analysis.forum@cls.fr>; Fri, 17 Nov 2006 17:48:03 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mailhost2.gsfc.nasa.gov (mailhost2.gsfc.nasa.gov [128.183.244.130])
	by rly40e.srv.mailcontrol.com (MailControl) with ESMTP id kAHHlhgZ004299
	for <ids.analysis.forum@cls.fr>; Fri, 17 Nov 2006 17:47:45 GMT
Received: from [128.183.107.161] (elbert.gsfc.nasa.gov [128.183.107.161])
	by mailhost2.gsfc.nasa.gov (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id kAHHleVJ003092
	for <ids.analysis.forum@cls.fr>; Fri, 17 Nov 2006 12:47:41 -0500
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.4.030702.0
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 17:49:31 +0000
Subject: Re: [ids.analysis.forum] Scaling of DORIS solution in ITRF 2005
From: "Frank G. Lemoine" <flemoine@puuoo.gsfc.nasa.gov>
To: <ids.analysis.forum@cls.fr>
Message-ID: <C183A6AB.7CC3%flemoine@puuoo.gsfc.nasa.gov>
In-Reply-To: <455C36AB.1040302@esgt.cnam.fr>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Mailcontrol-Inbound: Yezt0nsW3n+a55nIdo3YVEKkobUhl0Wf!2q29gyIwXPzX2!g7nNcig==
X-Spam-Score: 0.9
X-Scanned-By: MailControl A-07-06-70 (www.mailcontrol.com) on 10.69.0.150
X-Validation-by: flemoine@bowie.gsfc.nasa.gov

Dear Colleagues-

 It is not just the new DORIS stations we must consider,
 but how we introduce DORIS stations that are not part of the ITRF2005
 solution. I think we really introduce complications if we are going to
 (eventually) compare SLR/DORIS orbits with GPS produced Jason
 orbits. If you start scaling all the techniques in your
 ITRF, what is going to happen to comparisons with
 local ties?

FrankL-

 

>At 12:24 PM +0100 11/15/06, Jean-Paul Berthias wrote:
>  
>
>>Dear colleagues,
>>
>>As you probably know from previous Emails we intend to use a scaled
>>version of the ITRF2005 SLR solution as a reference for altimetry
>>missions (Jason, Topex, Envisat). This raises a question for DORIS:
>>should we scale the ITRF2005 solution in the same way as for SLR or
>>should we use the ITRF2005 DORIS solution as is ?
>>
>>I personally do not favor a scaling of the DORIS solution for
>>operational reasons: when new beacons are installed (and this
>>happens regularly with DORIS) the only coordinates that are
>>available for a long time are derived from GPS positioning. If we
>>scale ITRF2005, we will not know what to do to these coordinates,
>>scale them or not. If we use ITRF2005 as is for DORIS, we can
>>legitimately use ITRF2005 GPS based coordinates to fill in for new
>>stations. BUt this is not a very strong argument.
>>
>>I would like to hear your comments on this issue. Please let me know
>>if you have run tests with ITRF2005, with and without scaling (the
>>scaling we intend to apply to SLR is -1 ppb) and what your results
>>are.



                           Cliquez sur l'url suivante 
https://www.mailcontrol.com/sr/tI7CLJ473kUni1AmVDSsXmsm+9huhAtW3RpEGyTIWKIgbop9rkYwI+Z4JpTFKmx!BXFstQocvII8S0IR55H28J394Fg1TWGOOgrb6jVadurFR7B6mi5GTI9RuFcv3LdFHDq8aGbRSkGVGNBjnuI1ybEIdM4EtzPX0Y5847B+CrfZdC85t+abvRuTmrLBY!wf1GEOVlJBdJeBZ3oDNP+bpLPmgUSJxQ9e  
                    si ce message est ind?sirable (pourriel).
