X-Sympa-To: ids.analysis.forum
Received: from hector.cls.fr (osis.cls.fr [62.161.32.21])
	by hermes.cls.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA13049
	for <ids.analysis.forum@hermes.cls.fr>; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 11:56:01 +0200
Received: by hector.cls.fr (Postfix)
	id AB6E3A2897; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 08:58:09 +0000 (GMT)
Delivered-To: ids.analysis.forum@cls.fr
Received: from cluster-e.mailcontrol.com (orange-103.cls.fr [62.161.32.14])
	by hector.cls.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E68F9A2A52
	for <ids.analysis.forum@cls.fr>; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 08:58:08 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mx.inasan.ru (mx.inasan.ru [83.149.230.67])
	by rly20e.srv.mailcontrol.com (MailControl) with ESMTP id k2R8w5Nb020472
	for <ids.analysis.forum@cls.fr>; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 09:58:06 +0100
Received: from [195.19.72.43] (HELO statev)
  by mx.inasan.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8)
  with SMTP id 4471135 for ids.analysis.forum@cls.fr; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 12:58:04 +0400
X-AntiVirus: Checked by Dr.Web [version: 4.33, engine: 4.33.0.10250, virus records: 96866, updated: 21.11.2005]
Message-ID: <00c901c65117$e1960200$2b4813c3@inasan.rssi.ru>
From: "Suriya Tatevian" <statev@inasan.ru>
To: <ids.analysis.forum@cls.fr>
References: <200603241629.k2OGTeH28361@cnes.fr>
Subject: Re: [ids.analysis.forum] discussions about the  DORIS pole motion rates
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 00:35:54 +0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1506
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506
X-Mailcontrol-Inbound: QZjaA+ZJJwN5YHyPENypiY6PYHaLGMlP
X-Spam-Score: 3.3
X-Scanned-By: MailControl A-06-00-05 (www.mailcontrol.com) on 10.69.0.130
X-Validation-by: laurent.soudarin@cls.fr

Dear Laurent!
I agree with statements of Daniel and Zuheir ( see below), and think that PM
rates from DORIS data have a high noise level.
   " In DORIS data processing, there is probably a significant correlation
> between estimates of pole
> and pole rates. I thus guess that estimating pole rates leads to a
> degradation of the pole components
> derived and I would recommend NOT to estimate anymore pole rates."
>
" There is also the fundamental question about the physical meaning
> of the "linear daily PM rate" which still need more thoughts and
> discussion, not only for DORIS, but also for the other techniques.
> Sub-daily EOP fluctuations may or may not behave linearly, and
> given their magnitude (presumably less than 100 ľas), only GPS
> is, given it is precision, more sensitive to these EOP changes."
>
Best regards, Suriya Tatevian
Suriya Tatevian, Dr-Hab.
Institute of Astronomy,RAS
48,Pyatnitskaya str.
Moscow,RF
FAX  7-495-230-2081
TEL. 7-495-9512923
statev@inasan.ru



 
