X-Sympa-To: ids.analysis.forum
Received: from hector.cls.fr (osis.cls.fr [62.161.32.21])
	by hermes.cls.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA03395
	for <ids.analysis.forum@hermes.cls.fr>; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 20:51:14 +0200
Received: by hector.cls.fr (Postfix)
	id 1079EAB76; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 18:51:14 +0000 (GMT)
Delivered-To: ids.analysis.forum@cls.fr
Received: from rly26d.srv.mailcontrol.com (orange-102.cls.fr [62.161.32.13])
	by hector.cls.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E023BAAFB
	for <ids.analysis.forum@cls.fr>; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 18:51:12 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from nmta1.jpl.nasa.gov (nmta1.jpl.nasa.gov [137.78.160.214])
	by rly26d.srv.mailcontrol.com (MailControl) with ESMTP id j9JIp8bh003048
	for <ids.analysis.forum@cls.fr>; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 19:51:08 +0100
Received: from xmta1.jpl.nasa.gov (xmta1.jpl.nasa.gov [137.78.160.144])
	by nmta1.jpl.nasa.gov (Switch-3.1.7/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id j9JIp7ZL011382
	for <ids.analysis.forum@cls.fr>; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 11:51:07 -0700
Received: from [128.149.70.153] (mac01120073755.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.70.153])
	by xmta1.jpl.nasa.gov (Switch-3.1.7/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id j9JIp5C7020372
	for <ids.analysis.forum@cls.fr>; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 11:51:07 -0700
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p0620072dbf7c4555a55e@[128.149.70.153]>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 11:51:05 -0700
To: IDS_Analysis_Forum <ids.analysis.forum@cls.fr>
From: Pascal Willis <Pascal.R.Willis@jpl.nasa.gov>
Subject: HBKB/HBLB and DOMES number
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
X-Source-IP: mac01120073755.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.70.153]
X-Source-Sender: Pascal.R.Willis@jpl.nasa.gov
X-AUTH: Internal IP
X-Mailcontrol-Inbound: Gt28NPEf3YgENKlkcdS8f!5tlkt3OnCB16COtuSiUsY=
X-Spam-Score: 0.4
X-Scanned-By: MailControl A-05-40-01 (www.mailcontrol.com) on 10.68.0.136
X-Validation-by: ries@csr.utexas.edu

Dear Herve,

I confirm that having the same DOMES number for 2 different DORIS 
acronyms could create some problems in our analysis at JPL.

I guess that you could proceed as planned (2 DORIS acronyms and 1 
DOMES number) as it seems that there is a consensus.

What we would do here is exactly what we have done for TLHA/TLIA and 
KRUB/KRVB, just rename the station in the DORIS data file 
automatically so that HBLB will never appear in our solutions 
(internal and external).

Best regards
Pascal
-- 
Pascal Willis
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, MS 238-646     Ph : 1-818-393-4748
4800 Oak Grove Drive                      FAX: 1-818-393-4965
Pasadena CA 91109                         Em : Pascal.R.Willis@jpl.nasa.gov


 
