X-Sympa-To: ids.analysis.forum
Received: from hector.cls.fr (osis.cls.fr [62.161.32.21])
	by hermes.cls.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA12652
	for <ids.analysis.forum@hermes.cls.fr>; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 21:20:03 +0200
Received: by hector.cls.fr (Postfix)
	id 85D3FB5418; Tue,  9 Aug 2005 19:20:02 +0000 (GMT)
Delivered-To: ids.analysis.forum@cls.fr
Received: from rly04e.srv.mailcontrol.com (orange-103.cls.fr [62.161.32.14])
	by hector.cls.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0C3C1B562F; Tue,  9 Aug 2005 19:20:02 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from sol.csr.utexas.edu (sol.csr.utexas.edu [129.116.190.1])
	by rly04e.srv.mailcontrol.com (MailControl) with ESMTP id j79JJcTg024925;
	Tue, 9 Aug 2005 20:19:39 +0100
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by sol.csr.utexas.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j79JJcTs021947;
	Tue, 9 Aug 2005 14:19:38 -0500
Received: from sol.csr.utexas.edu ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (sol.csr.utexas.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with LMTP id 21738-05; Tue,  9 Aug 2005 14:19:34 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from [129.116.190.133] (ries.csr.utexas.edu [129.116.190.133])
	by sol.csr.utexas.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j79JJW29021932;
	Tue, 9 Aug 2005 14:19:32 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Sender: ries@sol.csr.utexas.edu
Message-Id: <p06020401bf1eafa8a9be@[129.116.190.133]>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 14:19:26 -0500
To: ids.analysis.forum@cls.fr
From: "John C. Ries" <ries@csr.utexas.edu>
Subject: temporary DORIS stations
Cc: IDS Governing board <ids.governing.board@cls.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at csr.utexas.edu
X-Mailcontrol-Inbound: c!PzNVdyE6pAgYrdZN4HGLIOLgW8bYa616COtuSiUsY=
X-Spam-Score: 0.6
X-Scanned-By: MailControl A-05-01-05 (www.mailcontrol.com)
X-Validation-by: feissel@ensg.ign.fr

Hi Everyone,

Herve has noted that the WETB station is intended only for a 
temporary occupation rather than as a part of the permanent network. 
We have tended to treat these temporary sites the same as the 
permanent sites. I think similar situations have occurred in the past 
leading to stations in our network like HVOA, WAIA, and AJAB, all of 
which we recently decided to ignore.

So the question is, what should the official position be on a site 
like WETB? Should we ignore it completely? Should it be ignored for 
POD but included for geodetic work? (this option would probably lead 
to some confusion)

Best regards,
John